Home Page | Reference Material Main Page | ROTRONIC Aw Systems
Accelerated Water Activity Measurement
Abstract |
The time required by water activity measurements can be cut in half simply by ventilating the product sample during measurements. Several predictive methods can be used to further reduce the time to measure Aw. Regardless of the technique used for measuring water activity, these methods involve giving a result well before actual equilibrium takes place. |
Conventional Water Activity Measurement |
Conventional
water activity instruments use a small sealed container (or sample holder) in which a
sample of the product is placed. Water activity can be measured as soon as the water vapor
pressure in the air trapped in the sample holder has equilibrated with that of the
product. Usually, this equilibration process is monitored by measuring the humidity of the
air above the product. Because temperature is important, either the temperature of the
product or the temperature of the air above the product, is also monitored. At equilibrium
conditions, %RH = 100 x Aw and water activity can be directly measured with a relative
humidity sensor or by any other means. If a chilled mirror is used to that purpose, both
the value of the dew point and the value of temperature are used to compute Aw. The natural (or static) equilibration of most products typically requires from 45 to 60 minutes and can take as long as a couple of hours. Because humidity changes at an extremely slow pace towards the end of the process, determining when the measurement is truly ended can be tricky. An additional difficulty is the requirement to maintain quasi constant temperature conditions during the entire measurement. |
Accelerated |
The
substantial amount of time required by the static equilibration process
explains why there is strong
interest in faster methods to measure Aw. |
|
|
Further reduction in the measurement time requires giving a result well before the full equilibration of the sample. The following describes 3 different methods of doing this, with varying degrees of sophistication: |
|
Method #1 |
End the measurement when the product is very close to equilibrium but not quite at full equilibrium. To do this, the humidity rate of change (%RH / minute) is constantly monitored and compared to a fixed value or limit. The measurement is ended when the rate of change, in absolute terms, falls below the limit. If the limit for the humidity rate of change trend is set at a very small value, the error on the measurement is also small but the time to measure is not shortened by much. By properly choosing the limit for the humidity trend, most products can be measured in typically 10 to 20 minutes with a deviation from the actual Aw of typically 0.01 Aw or less. |
|
Method #2 |
End the measurements in a manner similar to method #1 with the additional step of applying a correction to the result. This correction is likely to be based on experience with many different products. Because a correction is applied to the result, the measurement can be interrupted earlier than with method #1 (possibly after 5 to 6 minutes) without loss of accuracy. |
Method #3 |
Use the data from the humidity probe to compute a projection of the value of Aw, based on a mathematical model of the equilibration process. The measurement is ended when successive projections are in agreement with one another. When this method is properly applied, measurements are typically obtained within 5 minutes and the deviation from the actual value of Aw is typically 0.005 Aw or better. In summary, water activity can be measured in about half the usual time just by ventilating the product sample during measurements. Several methods are also available to further reduce the measurement time down to a few minutes. In one way or another, these methods anticipate the results of final equilibrium. Accelerated water activity measurement works well with most products. The time savings may come at the cost of some decrease in accuracy (or deviation from the actual value of Aw). With this in mind, R&D laboratories should still rely on conventional water activity measurement as a the ultimate reference. |